A MESSAGE FROM YOUR
PRESIDENT
Dear Fellow Members, Greetings!!
As I look out my window today, that is to say on the Ides of
March, I am somewhat discouraged. Though the snows of a fairly long
and cold winter had mostly melted away here in Westminster, melted
away to the point where there was much bare ground, even some green
grass to be found down where I live in the Valley of the
Connecticut. I see that the white flakes are once again falling.
Ugh!! Drat!! Double drat!! Triple drat, plus many other expletives
none of which ought ever to grace the pages of our Newsletter!!!! Oh
well, and in the words of an old Victorian Adage, "What cannot be
changed, must be endured." Spring will come some day, of that I am
sure, and with it, the start of the Covered Bridge visiting season.
Speaking of Covered Bridges, there is some interesting news this
quarter. Because of the press of much other business -- figuring
prominently on his list of present obligations, your President is
currently hard at work at drafting additions and revisions to the
text of a new addition of the World Guide -- I am going to have to
be fairly brief here and only summarize certain matters which, by
their inherent interest and importance, ought ordinarily to merit a
much fuller treatment. With no further ado, therefore, to the
bridges and various other related subjects.
The Bissell Covered Bridge in Charlemont, Massachusetts:
Those of you who have visited the Bissell Bridge, and are fond of
it, will be pleased to learn that this span was accepted for listing
on the National Register of Historic Places as of February 26th
2004. And now a bit of history. The present Bissell Bridge is
actually the second Covered Span to have occupied the site, and was
erected in the years 1950 and 1951. It replaced an 1880 Town Lattice
Truss Bridge which had, for whatever reasons, been allowed to fall
into a state of advanced decrepitude. Some of you may have read the
poem composed during the last days of the first Bissell Covered
Span, by Selectmen Clyde H. Churchill, William D. Pierson, and
Charles E. Streeter, of Charlemont, a poem which in the view of
these Selectmen, accurately described the then current condition of
the 1880 structure. This 'poem begins:
"Listen dear voters, and you
shall hear, From a board of
Selectmen crazed with fear,
That in the dead of night, with a mighty
roar, The Bissell Bridge
will be no more."
As a piece of polemic, the above poem was apparently quite
effective. William F. Callahan, Commissioner of the Department of
Public Works at the time, replied as follows:
"Struck by the setting's
natural beauty, The
Commissioner said 'twas the State's
duty, To save that lovely,
rustic view, And save the
State some money too, For it
seems the wood bridge can
compete, And still be
cheaper than concrete, The
Town, of course, will play its
part, To gladden every
tourist's heart."
And so the present Bissell Covered Bridge was duly built.
The official opening of the new Bissell Covered Bridge occurred
on Saturday, September 22nd 1951, and was marked by an impressive
parade, at least judging from contemporary newspaper accounts of the
event, as well as by the presence of many local dignitaries, and by
much "speechifying." Both Massachusetts Governor Paul A. Dever and
State Commissioner of Public Works, William F. Callahan were in
attendance for the occasion, and both presumably had something to
say. Very likely, a good time was had by everyone that day, and in
all probability, most folks who had been there present imagined that
the new Bissell Covered Bridge, successfully launched as it had
been, would continue to serve the traveling public well for many
years to come.
Serve the traveling public well for many years to come the
Bissell Covered Bridge has indeed done. In fact, it is only within
the last decade that anyone has been even the slightest bit doubtful
as to its performance, the most notable critic of the Bissell Bridge
during this period having been Mass. Highways.
As attentive readers of the Newsletter will already know, alas,
alas, alas, the new Bissell Covered Bridge is now closed. It has
been by-passed by some sort of a single-lane Bailey structure,
traffic over said structure being controlled by many attendant stop
lights, as many stop lights as one might encounter say in the middle
of New York City at some major intersection.
(And how much exactly has the installation of all these traffic
lights cost the Massachusetts taxpayer?!)
Given their druthers, Mass. Highways would most certainly
demolish the Bissell Covered Bridge, and replace it with what they
would probably descri13~ as a "replica" span, though just how
closely this "replica" would mimic the structure for which it had
been substituted is a matter of some legitimate doubt.
Fortunately, many townspeople in Charlemont have objected to the
removal of the Bissell Covered Bridge, so for the moment, this span
still stands. Its future preservation is anything but certain,
however, even inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places
will not, in and of itself, prevent demolition, though such
inclusion does oblige Mass. Highways to jump through a few
additional hoops. Fans of the Bissell Covered Bridge should
therefore keep their fingers and toes crossed, and hope for a
successful outcome to the present controversy, i.e., one which is
not 'preservationally challenged.' Further developments respecting
the Bissell Bridge will of course be reported in future President's
Messages.
The Bath-Haverhill Covered Bridge: Concerning proposals or
schemes for the stabilization and repair of the Bath-Haverhill
Covered Bridge, there are no recent developments to report.
Presumably, our engineering friend and his associates have been hard
at work drawing up their plans for the structure, but until these
plans have been completed, and subsequently passed around to other
consulting parties, of which, as most of you will already know, the
National Society is one, there is, as I have already said, nothing
to report.
Concerning prospective financing for a stabilization and repair
scheme, however, there is some news, albeit of a rather negative
sort. This news is the following: from what I have been able to
determine, and I have looked into the matter seriously, there is
simply nowhere near enough money formally committed to the
Bath-Haverhill project for anyone to be able to claim that this span
will be repaired and stable by a particular date, or to announce any
sort of construction schedule according to which the Bath-Haverhill
project shall allegedly proceed.
This having been said, it would be well, I think, to list those
monies which are known to be in the Bath- Haverhill till, so to
speak:
1) Some $152,000 from the State of New Hampshire, a sum allocated
to the towns of Bath and Haverhill in lieu of demolition of the
Bath-Haverhill Covered Bridge. (Members not familiar with the
Bath-Haverhill Covered span may not know that this bridge has
recently been by-passed. Were it not the great national treasure
that it is, this structure would likely have been taken down soon
after the completion of the new bridge now replacing it, which
operation, according to the State of New Hampshire, would have cost
$152,000, hence the amount of the above cited sum.)
2) An I.S.T.E.A. grant for $250,000, which grant requires a 20%
match, i.e., $50,000 from the two towns. (I presume this match has
been committed to the project by Bath and Haverhill out of their own
funds.)
To the best of my knowledge, there are no other monies formally
committed to the Bath-Haverhill project at the present time.
In light of the above, let us now do a few sums:
$152,000 plus $250,000 plus $50,000 equals $452,000. So far, so
good, except that as of last September, the Towns of Bath and
Haverhill had already spent some $72,000 for emergency repairs to
the Bath-Haverhill span, and for engineering. $450,000 minus $72,000
equals $380,000, a nice, tidy little sum, as I am sure most of you
would agree, but one which is unfortunately vastly inferior to what
will ultimately be required to repair and stabilize the
Bath-Haverhill Covered Bridge.
Our engineering friend, for example, in his much discussed
report, estimates that these repairs will cost in excess of one
million dollars, including engineering, and it is conceivable that
he is a bit short of the count. Even if the bill for the repairs in
questions were not to exceed one million dollars, $1,000,000 minus
$380,000 still leaves a short fall of $620,000, which sum the Towns
of Bath and Haverhill are probably not in a position to raise by
themselves, making use only of their own resources. Put another way,
until such time as funds more or less commensurate with the charges
that will be incurred in repairing and stabilizing the
Bath-Haverhill Covered Bridge have been formally committed to this
project, there is no project, or at least no project that amounts to
much. It is just as simple as that: without proper funding in place,
no bids can be accepted, nor any contracts let, period, hence there
is no project, as has been said.
Respecting funding for repairs to the Bath-Haverhill Covered
Bridge, this issue has become confused because, several years back,
then Senator Bob Smith of New Hampshire, secured a grant of $650,000
for the Bath-Haverhill project. The money in question was supposed
to have come through as an outright grant to the two communities,
but instead arrived with the requirement for a 20% match. 20% of
$650,000 is $130,000, a sum much in excess of what the Towns of Bath
and Haverhill feel they can invest themselves in the Bath-Haverhill
Covered Bridge.
And there, for the moment, the matter rests, at least as far as I
have been able to determine.
Senator Smith, before he left office, was not able to get the 20%
matching funds requirement removed from the $650,000 grant which he
did secure for the two towns. Though the two towns have requested
special legislation so as to be able to obtain the additional funds
they will require in order to repair and stabilize the
Bath-Haverhill Covered Bridge, neither Representative Bass's office,
nor the offices of Senators Gregg and Sununu, are at present
actively pursuing such legislation. The Bath-Haverhill repair and
stabilization project therefore bears watching closely by all of us.
Needless to say, but I shall say it anyway, further developments
regarding this span shall be fully reported on future pages of the
President's Message.
Happy Bridging!!
Sincerely, Your
President, David W. Wright |